|
|
Post by Byrnes_Baby on Apr 17, 2006 9:01:16 GMT -5
 ok im probs imagining this but it looks as if gina has a vey slight bump in thestomach area....... makes u wonder |
|
|
|
Post by susie on Apr 17, 2006 9:04:00 GMT -5
if she was expecting, the bump would be lower down, so it's not what you think.
|
|
|
|
Post by westlifegirl on Apr 17, 2006 9:20:21 GMT -5
if she was expecting, the bump would be lower down, so it's not what you think. My point exactly. So my conclusion would be that Gina is not expecting - well not yet, anyway |
|
|
|
Post by Byrnes_Baby on Apr 17, 2006 9:33:08 GMT -5
hmm i thought tht.....bit it still doesnt look like she usually does......nah its probs just her top.......just looked a bit suspicious.
|
|
|
|
Post by westlifegirl on Apr 17, 2006 9:35:55 GMT -5
hmm i thought tht.....bit it still doesnt look like she usually does......nah its probs just her top.......just looked a bit suspicious. I totally understand how suspicious it looks, but when I saw this piccie I thought of a friend of mine who looked the same a while back. I thought that this friend of mine was expecting, but she isn't. It was just her clothes that made her look like she was expecting, that's all. On some pictures, it can look like a woman is pregnant when she isn't. In these situations, it doesn't necessarily mean that the person photographed has put on weight - it usually means that the photographer has used a zooming position or whatever, that makes it look that way. I dunno... But having checked the Gina pic closer, I don't think she looks pregnant or as if she's put on weight. It looks like it's her top that does it, really. |
|
|
|
Post by *Sexy Feehily* on Apr 17, 2006 10:16:48 GMT -5
that green top, looks like its tied very close under her rib cage, which would pull the lower top in tight, so that's just it Kazza hun, i'm sure we'd know especially on someone who is as skinny as Gina, you'd know straight away if she was expecting
|
|
|
|
Post by westlifegirl on Apr 17, 2006 10:23:01 GMT -5
that green top, looks like its tied very close under her rib cage, which would pull the lower top in tight, so that's just it Kazza hun, i'm sure we'd know especially on someone who is as skinny as Gina, you'd know straight away if she was expecting Yup, that's true. |
|
|
|
Post by zotjuh on Apr 17, 2006 10:41:24 GMT -5
i agree with you trudie
|
|
|
|
Post by shane and nicky's sweetheart on Apr 17, 2006 10:59:36 GMT -5
when a woman is this you can hardly see if she is pregnant you can see it better when a woman is already a bit more fat thats what my mum always says but wouldent it be rate if nicky would say gina is pregnant wow that would be grate
|
|
|
|
Post by shane and nicky's sweetheart on Apr 17, 2006 11:00:16 GMT -5
i ment when a woman is thin you can hardly see if she is prenant
|
|
|
|
Post by Byrnes_Baby on Apr 17, 2006 11:54:11 GMT -5
i think thw thinner u are, the more pregnat u look when u are..... if tht made sense..... i didnt think she was preggers....just tht pic looked suspicious......mind there was a similar pic laast year, just no1 sed nout. aww...it wud b good if it was tru...i want a baby byrne.
|
|
|
|
Post by shane and nicky's sweetheart on Apr 17, 2006 12:04:00 GMT -5
i agree on that
|
|
|
|
Post by susie on Apr 18, 2006 2:25:27 GMT -5
well I have had 4 babies and I didn't start showing till 3 to 4 months, and then it was lower down. I think it will be another year or so before the Byrnes have any babies, they are very busy so I think they will wait a bit longer
|
|
|
|
Post by westlifegirl on Apr 18, 2006 3:00:30 GMT -5
well I have had 4 babies and I didn't start showing till 3 to 4 months, and then it was lower down. I think it will be another year or so before the Byrnes have any babies, they are very busy so I think they will wait a bit longer Agreed, the Byrnes are very busy indeed, doing other things. |
|
|
|
Post by Byrnes_Baby on Apr 18, 2006 5:19:46 GMT -5
ye we know....but it would be good tho.....nix has often sed hes starting to get "very broody" (BLESS HIM) hehe
|
|
